Pricing Login

Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice : Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

TMI - e-Newsletter TaxTMI Company's expenses disallowed, but no penalty as... TaxTMI Goods matched documents like e-way bill and... TaxTMI Income tax reassessment validity: AO initiated... TaxTMI Sale-purchase loss disallowed unreasonably by tax... TaxTMI Revision: Hospital receipts verified, partial... TaxTMI Inflated invoices by employees led to pre-existing... TaxTMI NRI's unexplained mutual fund investment & capital... TaxTMI Land sale profit: Business income or long-term... TaxTMI Lending business earned interest spread, no... TaxTMI Sugar mills' parallel pricing insufficient for... TaxTMI Loan providers' interest rate hikes and penalties... TaxTMI Alleged cartelization dismissed due to lack of... TaxTMI Money laundering case: Balancing PMLA bail... TaxTMI Export of service partly performed outside India... TaxTMI Technical testing firm wins CENVAT credit case;... TaxTMI Latest Case-Laws TaxTMI Latest Notifications + Circulars TaxTMI GST Council Decisions TaxTMI

Home

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2002 (11) TMI AT This

Login
Referred In
Summary

Forgot password New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

2002 (11) TMI 620 - AT - Customs

2015 (11) TMI 1397 - AT

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal partially, reducing the redemption fine from Rs. 8 lakhs to Rs. 1.10 lakhs and the penalty from Rs. 2 lakhs to Rs. 25,000. The value of the imported monitors was assessed at US$ 8 per monitor.

← Previous Next →

Quick Updates:

What's New:
Latest Case Laws

What's New:
Latest Notifications

What's New:
Latest Circulars

N: Central Government approves SKAN Research Trust, Bengaluru under the c...

F: RCM on Rent for Exempted Commodity

N: Amendment in Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax, dated the 19th June...

F: RMC ON FRIGHT

F: GST AUDIT U/S 65 AND SHOW CAUSE U/S 73

F: ITC on Inward supplies availed in the next Financial Year

H: Personal hearing mandatory before heavy penalty order; natural justice...

H: No invoice/e-way bill discrepancy, areca nut seller deemed owner as pe...

H: Appellate tribunal rejects delay condonation, upholds strict adherence...

H: Apex Court upholds 'socialist' and 'secular' in Constitution's Preambl...

H: GST Circular allows filing rectification for input tax credit claims t...

H: GST hike dispute: Petitioner gets relief, gov't entity to reimburse 6%...

H: Fabric manufacturer wins tax case over CENVAT credit denial due to lac...

H: Fixed deposits in Krishi Bank treated as investments; loss on liquidat...

H: Amalgamated company's income assessment challenged due to jurisdiction...

H: Government Ayurveda Institute's Share Capital Interest Dispute: Treate...

H: Interest on enhanced compensation for land acquisition: Taxable or exe...

H: Cash payment exceeding limit during sale deed registration wrongly pen...

H: Undisclosed income declared under IDS 2016 can't be treated as unexpla...

H: Tax deduction denied for incomplete housing project & excess commercia...

H: Stone article exporters win relief from classification dispute.

F: GST on Solar Plant

A: ELECTRONIC CASH LEDGER

A: CENVAT credit can be claimed for telecom infrastructure

A: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GST

A: ITC on Telecommunication Towers: Bharti Airtel (SC) implication in GST...

N: Amendment in Notification No. 18/2021-Customs (ADD), dated the 27th Ma...

A: PENALTY ON DIRECTORS CONTRAVENING EXPORT REGULATIONS UNDER FOREIGN EXC...

A: Difference between “License” and “Royalty”

A: Penalty proceedings under Section 130 of the CGST Act cannot be initia...

↑Top