9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act involving the demerger of a company to another as a going concern. Analysis: The Company Petition filed sought sanction for the Scheme of Arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, involving the demerger of the petitioner-company to another company as a going concern. The Scheme aimed at transferring the petitioner-company to the transferee-company without further act or deed, as per section 394 of the Act. The authorised, issued, and subscribed capital of both companies were detailed in the petition, along with the necessity to reduce the share premium account as per the Scheme Clause 5.4. The petitioner-company conducted meetings with equity shareholders and creditors, obtaining overwhelming approval for the Scheme. The stock exchanges issued No Objection letters, and all necessary formalities were duly complied with. The Regional Director confirmed the Scheme was not prejudicial to the interests of creditors and shareholders. No objections were received from any party, and all relevant aspects under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act were addressed in the Scheme. The Scheme was modified to include a new transferee-company, and all rights and obligations were transferred accordingly. The Scheme considered various aspects such as share capital, transfer of assets, accounting treatment, conduct of business, profits division, legal proceedings, and employee transfers, ensuring compliance with legal requirements. The Court, after considering the Scheme as a whole and finding no illegality or unreasonableness, granted sanction as prayed. Citing legal principles and previous judgments, the Court deemed the Scheme fair, reasonable, and in accordance with the law. The majority approval by shareholders further supported the sanctioning of the Scheme. Consequently, the Company Petition was made absolute with costs to be paid to the Regional Director within a specified period.
|
