2003 (3) TMI 10 - HC - Income Tax

(i) Whether, the Tribunal was right in law to direct the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under section 158BB in respect of the book profit though no return of income has been filed under section 139(1)/139(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961? (ii) Whether the Tribunal was right in law in holding that disallowance under section 40A(3) was not called for once net profit rate has been applied to compute the income? - Both the questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of deduction under section 158BB for assessment years 1988-89, 1989-90, and 1994-95.
2. Application of disallowance under section 40A(3) for assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred two questions to the High Court. The first question pertained to the deduction under section 158BB for certain assessment years. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under section 158BB based on the income as per the books of account, which was below the taxable limit. The court examined the relevant provisions of section 158BB and emphasized that the undisclosed income of the block period should be computed based on the evidence found during search or seizure. The court noted that the amendment by the Finance Act, 2002, clarified the treatment of income below the taxable limit as per the books of account. It was held that the tax liability should be fixed according to the income as per the books of account for certain years within the block period.

Issue 2:
The second question revolved around the application of disallowance under section 40A(3) for specific assessment years. The Tribunal had granted benefit to the assessee under section 40A(3), leading to an appeal by the Revenue. The court examined the provisions of section 40A(3) and the Tribunal's decision in the original appeal. The Tribunal had deleted the addition under section 40A(3) for the relevant assessment years based on the application of a net profit rate. The court agreed with the submission that when the income is computed using a net profit rate, there is no need for further deduction under section 40A(3). Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue on both issues, highlighting the correct application of the provisions in each scenario.

In conclusion, the High Court provided a detailed analysis of the legal provisions involved in the case, addressing the interpretation of deduction under section 158BB and the application of disallowance under section 40A(3) for the respective assessment years. The judgment clarified the tax treatment based on the income as per the books of account and the implications of applying a net profit rate in determining the taxable income.