2004 (6) TMI 426 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues involved:
1. Whether the value of clearances of excisable goods liable to Central Excise duty under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act is to be considered for determining the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods for home consumption during the preceding financial year.

Analysis:
The appeal in question pertains to M/s. K.L. Concast Ltd. and centers around the interpretation of whether the value of clearances of goods under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act should be factored in when calculating the aggregate value of clearances for home consumption. The appellant argued that their goods were previously under the Compounded Levy Scheme and later became liable for duty under Section 3, claiming the benefit of a specific notification. The dispute arose when the authorities disallowed this benefit, citing that the value of clearances under Section 3A should be included in the calculation, as it exceeded the specified limit. The appellant contended that the notification did not mention clearances under Section 3A and thus should not be considered for determining the aggregate value. The Department, represented by the learned DR, supported the lower authorities' decisions.

Upon examination, the Tribunal found that the Notification in question allowed benefits subject to the condition that the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods does not exceed a specified amount. It was noted that the value of clearances of goods under Section 3A during the preceding financial year constitutes excisable goods and should be considered for calculating the aggregate value. The Tribunal highlighted that the Notification did not exclude the value of clearances under Section 3A from the calculation. Instead, certain specific clearances were excluded, which did not include goods under Section 3A. The Tribunal emphasized that the value of clearances of goods subject to duty under Section 3A should be included in determining the aggregate value for home consumption, as per the Notification's provisions.

The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's argument that the Notification did not mention Section 3A, explaining that the different sections of the Central Excise Act provide distinct values for various purposes. It clarified that the value of clearances for goods under Section 3A should be determined under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, as they were not notified under Section 4A or assigned a Tariff Value under Section 3. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the value of clearances of goods liable to Excise duty under Section 3A must be considered for calculating the aggregate value for home consumption in the preceding financial year. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision and rejected the appeal.