Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (7) TMI 418 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Stay of operation of Order-in-Appeal No. 22/2004(T)-C.E.
2. Eligibility for Modvat credit on inputs and materials used in the mines pending appeal.

Analysis:
1. The applicants sought a stay of the operation of Order-in-Appeal No. 22/2004(T)-C.E., which held that no registration is required for exempted products under Central Excise law. The Commissioner stated that registration is only necessary for premises where manufacturing activity occurs, and mere excavation and loading of limestone does not constitute manufacturing under the C.E. Act. The mining area cannot be considered part of the factory manufacturing cement. The learned Counsel argued that denying the stay would prevent them from availing Modvat credit on inputs and materials used in the mines pending appeal.

2. The prayer for a stay was contested by the learned SDR, asserting that the order was legally sound and passed after due consideration and application of the law. The SDR argued that there was no prima facie case to grant a stay under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. After careful consideration, the Tribunal, comprising Dr. S.L. Peeran and Shri K.C. Mamgain, agreed with the SDR. They found the order proper and legally sound, with no significant defects necessitating a stay. The Tribunal emphasized that the mining area, being exempted from the Excise Act, cannot be included in the factory's Ground Plan. Consequently, the application for a stay was deemed meritless and rejected.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates