Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2004 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2004 (4) TMI 491 - AT - Customs

Issues: Classification of imported goods under Tariff Headings for customs duty and countervailing duty.

Classification for Customs Duty:
The case involved imported goods, connecting rod forgings, and cross-forgings, with the original authority rejecting the reassessment claims under different Tariff Headings. The lower appellate authority accepted the respondents' plea, emphasizing that the imported forgings were not finished parts of scooters and 3-wheeled vehicles. The Tribunal analyzed previous cases and concluded that the imported goods had attained the approximate shape of the finished articles, specifically connecting rods and crosses, suitable for the appellants' vehicles. The Tribunal upheld the classification under Tariff Headings 87.09/12(1) and 84.06 CTA 1975 for customs duty.

Classification for Countervailing Duty:
The lower appellate authority failed to address the classification under Tariff Item 26AA or Tariff Item 68 CET for countervailing duty, prompting the appeals before the Tribunal by the Revenue. The Tribunal considered previous judgments and reiterated that the imported goods, connecting rod forgings, and cross-forgings, were appropriately classified under Tariff Item 26AA for countervailing duty. The Tribunal upheld the classification decisions for countervailing duty based on the specific characteristics and intended use of the imported goods.

Reconsideration of Previous Decision:
The respondents' advocate cited a recent judgment for reconsideration, but the Tribunal upheld its decision based on the specific classification of the goods involved in the present case. The Tribunal emphasized that the 'essential character' of goods should be determined based on the goods under consideration, not general principles. Consequently, the Tribunal reaffirmed the classification of connecting rod forgings under Tariff Heading 84.06 and cross-forgings under Tariff Heading 87.09/12(1) for customs duty and under Tariff Item 26AA for countervailing duty. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, maintaining the classification decisions for both customs duty and countervailing duty.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates