2005 (9) TMI 475 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
Transfer of unutilized Modvat credit upon takeover of a company without explicit permission from authorities.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Transfer of Modvat Credit
The appeal was filed by M/s. Hindustan Lever Ltd. against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nagpur. The appellants had taken over M/s. Brooke Bond Lipton (India) Ltd. (BBL) along with all assets and liabilities as per a Court's Order. They continued the manufacturing activities of the acquired company and requested the transfer of unutilized Modvat credit from BBL to their account. Despite no communication from the Department granting permission for the transfer, the appellants transferred the credit and informed the Department. A Show Cause Notice was issued questioning the transfer and demanding recovery under the Central Excise Rules.

Issue 2: Legal Precedent
The issue was compared to a case involving Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Vishakhapatnam v. M/s. Usha Iron & Ferro Metals Corpn. Ltd., where it was held that Modvat credit must be considered in the context of inputs received and utilized in a factory. The judgment emphasized that even with a change in management, if the operations and goods remain the same as before, the eligibility for Modvat credit continues. The judgment highlighted that denial of Modvat credit is not warranted when inputs and finished products remain unchanged post-takeover.

Issue 3: Permission for Transfer
The appellants had proactively sought permission from authorities for the transfer, which was also communicated internally. However, there was no explicit communication either granting or refusing permission. The Tribunal held that in such circumstances, where the authorities fail to respond within a reasonable time, permission can be deemed to have been granted. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, noting that the appellants had followed the correct procedure in seeking permission for the transfer of Modvat credit.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision was based on the principles established in previous legal precedents, emphasizing the continuity of Modvat credit eligibility despite a change in management as long as the manufacturing operations and goods remain the same. The Tribunal also highlighted the importance of proactive communication and deemed permission when authorities fail to respond within a reasonable timeframe.