9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Appeal against final finding on imports below normal value; Challenge to dumping finding affecting reputation; Relevance of final finding in future proceedings; Withdrawal of appeal.
In this case, the appeal was filed challenging the final finding that imports were made below their normal value from subject countries. The appellant contended that the finding of dumping by them would harm their reputation and sought to challenge it. However, no duty was recommended as the domestic industry was not found to have suffered material injury. The counsel for the authority assured that the dumping margin finding would not impact any future proceedings, and the appellant's concerns were unfounded. The Tribunal noted that the final finding on dumping, along with the absence of material injury to the domestic industry, would not carry relevance in future proceedings under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act for a different investigation period. It was emphasized that fresh determinations would be required for any new proceedings, and the appeal against such an order might not be maintainable. Consequently, the appellant sought to withdraw the appeal, which was granted, leading to the disposal of the appeal. The judgment was delivered on 9-3-2006, with Justice R.K. Abichandani presiding over the case. The representation included advocates for both the appellant and the respondent. The Tribunal's decision highlighted the limited impact of the final finding on dumping in future proceedings and the appellant's right to withdraw the appeal based on the understanding of the legal provisions and the specific circumstances of the case.
|
