9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Confiscation of gold under Customs Act 2. Imposition of penalties under Customs Act 3. Effect of acquittal in criminal case on Customs proceedings 4. Application of legal precedents in setting aside penalties Issue 1: Confiscation of gold under Customs Act The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Hyderabad ordered the absolute confiscation of 23 Gold Biscuits and 2 Gold Ingots valued at Rs. 14 lakhs under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The gold was seized from the shop of the appellants on suspicion of being of foreign origin, and the appellants failed to prove licit import despite producing documents like baggage receipts. The Commissioner did not accept the documents and ordered for confiscation and imposed penalties. Issue 2: Imposition of penalties under Customs Act Penalties of Rs. 5 lakhs on one individual and Rs. 1 lakh on another were imposed under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act. Additionally, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on a third individual. The penalties were based on the belief that the seized gold was illicitly imported, and the appellants failed to discharge the burden of proving licit import, as per the Commissioner's order. Issue 3: Effect of acquittal in criminal case on Customs proceedings A criminal case was filed against the appellants, and they were acquitted by the Special Judge for Economic Offences, who found that the gold was duty paid and not smuggled. The judgment of the Special Court established that the seized gold was not smuggled and was duty paid, contradicting the Customs Commissioner's decision. The appellants argued that the acquittal in the criminal case should lead to setting aside the Customs penalties. Issue 4: Application of legal precedents in setting aside penalties The appellants relied on legal precedents to support their argument that the acquittal in the criminal case should impact the Customs proceedings. They cited cases where acquittal in prosecution cases led to setting aside penalties imposed by Customs authorities. The appellants sought the setting aside of penalties and the return of the seized gold based on the acquittal and the duty paid nature of the gold established in the criminal case judgment. In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order, allowing the appeals and directing the Revenue to return the seized gold or its value to the appellants within three months. The judgment emphasized the importance of the acquittal in the criminal case and the duty paid nature of the gold in determining the outcome of the Customs proceedings.
|
