9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Classification of Hospital Operation Theatre Lamps under Customs Tariff Act - Disagreement on classification between appellant and original authority - Interpretation of HSN Explanatory Notes - Appeal against Order-in-Appeal.
Analysis: The appeal involved the classification of 8 pieces of Hospital Operation Theatre Lamps under the Customs Tariff Act. The appellants claimed classification under CSH 9018.19, while the original authority re-classified the goods under CSH 8539.39 as 'Other Discharge Lamps'. The difference in classification resulted in varying rates of duty. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) rejected the appellant's claim based on the HSN Explanatory Notes, stating that operating lights do not have a preventive, curative, or diagnostic purpose, as required under CSH 9018.19. The appellants challenged this decision, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The appellant's representative argued several points to support their classification claim. They emphasized that the lights were specifically designed for surgical operations, with features tailored for operation theatres. They referenced previous tribunal decisions to support their argument, highlighting cases where similar products were classified under medical apparatus categories. Additionally, they pointed out that the specific use of the lights in surgical settings should influence their classification under CSH 9018.19. On the other hand, the JCDR for the Revenue contended that Operation Theatre Lights should not be considered as Instruments and Appliances, thus ruling out classification under CH 90.18. The JCDR supported the legality and correctness of the impugned order. Upon careful examination of the technical literature and the HSN Explanatory Notes, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments. They noted the special features of the product, such as minimal shadow formation and optimized illumination depth, which were specifically designed for surgical settings. The Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner (Appeals)'s conclusion that the lights lacked preventive, curative, or diagnostic purposes. They highlighted that any surgical operation inherently serves a curative or preventive purpose, thus justifying the classification of the lights under CSH 9018.19 as Other Electro Medical Apparatus. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order in appeal. In conclusion, the Tribunal's detailed analysis of the classification dispute, considering the specific design and purpose of the Hospital Operation Theatre Lamps, led to a favorable decision for the appellants, emphasizing the importance of the intended use of the goods in determining their classification under the Customs Tariff Act.
|
