9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Challenge to order of remand by Commissioner (A) regarding benefit of Notification No. 21/2002 for concessional rates on imported parts of transmission equipment. Analysis: The appellant, a PSU, challenged the order of remand by the Commissioner (A) regarding the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002 for concessional rates on imported parts of transmission equipment. The appellants imported parts of transmission equipment and claimed the benefit of the notification, which was denied during assessment under Chapter Heading No. 852990.90 of Customs Tariff. The Commissioner (A) remanded the matter to the Original Authority for a de novo consideration, directing a reevaluation of the classification adopted by the Department. The appellant argued that the remand proceedings should only focus on the claim of the benefit of the Notification, citing various legal precedents in support of their position. The learned Counsel representing the appellant requested modification of the remand order to instruct the Original Authority to consider only the claim of Notification. On the other hand, the learned JDR presented para-wise comments from the Commissioner, asserting that regardless of the classification, the benefit of the Notification was not applicable in the circumstances of the case. The Tribunal, comprising Dr. S.L. Peeran and Shri T.K. Jayaraman, observed that the Commissioner (A) had remanded the matter to the Original Authority without passing a speaking order on the denial of the benefit of the Notification during assessment. The Tribunal noted that since the assessment had been finalized by the assessing officer and the Revenue had not appealed against it, the direction to reevaluate the classification was deemed incorrect and legally unsound based on the cited judgments. Consequently, the Tribunal accepted the appellant's plea to modify the remand direction, instructing the Original Authority to solely consider the claim of the benefit of the Notification. The Original Authority was directed to conclude the de novo proceedings within four months from the date of the order, ensuring a fair hearing to the appellants in line with the principles of natural justice. As a result, the appeal was allowed, providing specific directions to the Original Authority for further proceedings.
|
