2005 (4) TMI 526 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues involved:
1. Assessment of duty on the quantity of tin plates used in manufacturing tin containers.
2. Dispute regarding the calculation of assessable value based on the quantity of tin plates consumed.
3. Imposition of penalty due to duty calculation mistake.

Analysis:
1. The appellant filed an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) concerning the duty assessment on the quantity of tin plates used in manufacturing tin containers on a job work basis. The Revenue contended that a higher quantity of tin plates was received by the appellant during the specified period, leading to a differential duty demand. However, the appellant maintained records showing the actual consumption of tin plates as 302.536 MT, disputing the Revenue's calculation based on average weight. The Tribunal noted that the appellant's records were consistent with the actual consumption, and since the actual receipt and balance of tin plates were not disputed, the demand based on average weight was deemed unsustainable and set aside.

2. The dispute further revolved around the calculation of the assessable value of the goods manufactured based on the quantity of tin plates consumed. The Revenue argued for considering an average weight of tin plates consumed, while the appellant contended that their internal records accurately reflected the consumption of 302.536 MT during the disputed period. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's diligent record-keeping practices, which included details of tin sheet receipts and usage in manufacturing tin containers. As the appellant promptly rectified any duty calculation mistake upon notification by the Revenue, the penalty imposed was also set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

3. The Tribunal's decision highlighted the importance of maintaining accurate records in demonstrating the actual consumption of raw materials in manufacturing processes. By upholding the appellant's records and rejecting the Revenue's reliance on average weight calculations, the Tribunal emphasized the significance of documentary evidence in resolving disputes related to duty assessment and penalty imposition. The judgment underscored the need for transparency and precision in maintaining records to support claims and defenses in customs and excise matters, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant in this case.