Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (12) TMI 483 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty.
2. Duty liability on branded goods and own manufactured goods.
3. Exemption limit for Small Scale Unit.

Analysis:
The case involved the appellant, a Small Scale Unit manufacturing Super Enamelled Copper Wire, where Central Excise Officers found goods manufactured as branded items of another company during a visit to the factory. The Officers seized the goods and initiated proceedings through a show cause notice proposing confiscation and penalty. The Assistant Commissioner later passed an order confiscating the goods with an option to redeem on payment of a fine and imposed a penalty, along with confirming a duty demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this order.

The main issue raised by the appellant was the duty confirmation on both branded and own manufactured goods, arguing that being a Small Scale Unit within the exemption limit, no duty was applicable to their own goods. They contended that duty on branded goods should be paid at clearance, and since all goods were within the factory premises, no offense was committed to warrant confiscation or penalty. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and the facts, agreed with the appellant's arguments. It was acknowledged that the appellant's sales were below the exemption limit, and the branded goods were manufactured for the first time. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellant's own goods were duty-exempt, and duty on branded goods should be paid at clearance. The Tribunal also found no justification for the confiscation of goods or imposition of a penalty, thus setting aside the impugned order. However, it was clarified that duty on branded goods must be paid at clearance if not already done. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates