HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the ...

Tax Reassessment Invalidated: Second Section 148 Notice Exceeds Four-Year Limitation Period, Rendering Proceedings Null and Void

April 5, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period of four years from the end of AY 2016-17. The first Section 148 notice was validly issued on 23.06.2021, six days before the extended limitation deadline. However, the subsequent second Section 148 notice was time-barred. Consequently, all proceedings initiated pursuant to the second notice were set aside. The court relied on precedential rulings and statutory interpretations, specifically focusing on procedural time constraints in tax reassessment proceedings. The decision effectively invalidated the subsequent reassessment notice due to non-compliance with prescribed limitation periods.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the ...

Tax Reassessment Invalidated: Second Section 148 Notice Exceeds Four-Year Limitation Period, Rendering Proceedings Null and Void

April 5, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

The High Court examined the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, considering the sanction requirement u/s 151 and the impact of the...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

HC held that show cause notices under Section 74(1) of CGST Act for alleged tax evasion must be issued separately for each financial year rather than through...

Orders u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) - period of limitation - True, the provision was amended bringing in a limitation of four years, in 2010 and then later extended to six...

Re-assessment - Time limitation for notices issued - period of limitation enhanced from 5 years to 6 years - Prospective or retrospective amendment - 5 year period...

The HC quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 initiated via notice u/s 148 issued on July 29, 2022. The Court found that since the reassessment action commenced...

The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings. The AO's satisfaction note for invoking reassessment proceedings...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

The HC allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of reassessment dated 30.05.2018 by the Assessing Officer as being barred by limitation under proviso to Section 40 of...

HC invalidated reassessment proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A, finding a critical procedural defect. The AO's notice failed to substantiate the claim...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

The High Court held that the impugned notices issued for Assessment Years 2009-10 to 2014-15 u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act were valid and not time-barred. The court...

The HC held that the four-year limitation period u/s 64 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, pertains to the initiation of revisional proceedings by the...

Quick Updates: