HC allowed the petition challenging a tax order under Section ...

Tax Order Quashed: Procedural Defects Invalidate Summary Dismissal of Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 73(9)

April 5, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC allowed the petition challenging a tax order under Section 73(9) of CGST Act, 2017. The court found the original order non-speaking and procedurally defective, as the tax officer summarily dismissed the petitioner's reply without substantive reasoning. The order was set aside, directing the tax authority to reconsider the matter and provide a proper hearing to the petitioner, ensuring principles of natural justice are upheld. The decision emphasizes the requirement for reasoned, transparent administrative actions in tax proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the petition challenging a tax order under Section ...

Tax Order Quashed: Procedural Defects Invalidate Summary Dismissal of Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 73(9)

April 5, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC invalidated tax determination order due to procedural non-compliance with AGST Act 2017. Authority failed to issue proper Show Cause Notice (SCN) under Section 73(1),...

HC set aside GST assessment order due to absence of assessing officer's signature, holding it as a fatal procedural defect. The court determined that signature...

Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting Section 9 application as defective without issuing notice to rectify defects within seven days as...

HC held that summary show cause notice (SCN) in Form GST DRC-01 cannot substitute proper SCN under Section 73(1) of AGST Act, 2017. The impugned order was quashed as it...

Validity of assessment order pursuant to order u/s 144C - there is no direction given by the ld. DRP to ld. Assessing Officer but the directions were only given to the...

Time Limitation - validity of orders passed by the 1st respondent u/s 73(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - The High Court observed that, the...

NCLAT dismissed appeal concerning operational creditor's Section 9 application under IBC. Court held that while Section 8 notice is mandatory prerequisite for filing...

HC held that issuance of only a Summary Show Cause Notice (SCN) in Form GST DRC-01 violates natural justice principles and fails to comply with Section 73(1) of AGST...

Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s 139(9) or not - in whose name the refund should be issued? - PAN database correction would certainly indicate...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's rejection of the Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor. The key points are: The Operational...

Non-issuance of a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73(1) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (AGST Act) prior to passing the impugned order u/s 73(9) violates...

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ground that the amount paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is not admissible u/r 9(1)(bb) of CENVAT...

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

Dismissal of an appeal by the appellate authority due to procedural defects, including the failure to submit a Board Resolution appointing the authorized signatory, the...

Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent...

Quick Updates: