2007 (3) TMI 406 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition on account of social security contribution.
2. Applicability of CBDT Circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deletion of Addition on Account of Social Security Contribution

The Revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 1,85,522 made by the Assessing Officer on account of social security contribution. The Ld. CIT(A) had held that the employer's share of social security contribution is not taxable in the hands of the assessee since he does not have any vested rights therein till he attains the age of retirement. Furthermore, the contribution by the employer is considered a "diversion of the income by overriding title" and not an "application of income" after it reaches the hands of the assessee.

Issue 2: Applicability of CBDT Circular Regarding Monetary Limits for Filing Appeals

The tax effect in the appeal filed by the Revenue is less than Rs. 2 lakhs. According to C.B.D.T. Instruction No. 2, dated 24-10-2005, the department should not have filed the appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal referenced the decision of ITAT Delhi Bench in the case of Vikram Bhatnagar [IT Appeal No. 60 (Delhi) of 2002, dated 10-3-2006] and the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT v. Pithwa Engg. Works [2005] 276 ITR 519, which emphasized that the Board's circulars are binding on the Revenue and should be applied to both new and old cases to avoid unnecessary litigation and reduce the burden on the courts.

The Tribunal also cited the case of Asstt. CIT v. Rajoo Engineers Ltd. [2006] 100 ITD 555 (Rajkot), which supported the applicability of the circular to cases prior to the issuance of the circular. The instructions issued by the CBDT are binding on all departmental authorities as per section 119 of the IT Act, and these instructions aim to reduce arrears of appeals in Courts and Tribunals.

Further, the Tribunal referenced ITAT, Hyderabad Bench in the case of Dy. CWT v. Nb. Syed Jaffar Ali Khan [2005] 1 SOT 691, which reiterated the necessity for revenue authorities to follow the policy decisions taken by the CBDT to reduce litigation and costs. The Tribunal emphasized that the instructions issued under section 119 of the IT Act are binding on income-tax authorities and should be followed to achieve the objectives laid down by the Board.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, stating that the instructions for not filing appeals with a tax effect less than the specified amount are binding and should be followed to avoid unnecessary litigation.

Result:

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.