9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Refund claim rejection in cash and direction to re-credit in DEPB license. Analysis: The case involved the appellants importing goods and filing bills of entry for assessment, producing DEPB license for duty debit. The adjudicating authority disputed the invoice value, which was later reduced by the Tribunal, resulting in excess debit in DEPB. The appellants sought a cash refund, but the authority directed re-credit in DEPB, citing Section 27 eligibility criteria for duty refund. The appellant argued that the DEPB debit deprived them of cash benefits, as they couldn't sell the expired license. However, the Department contended that no duty was paid to the government due to the DEPB exemption under Notification No. 34/97. The Tribunal analyzed Section 27, emphasizing the requirement of duty payment for refund eligibility. It noted that customs duty under Section 25 is exempted, with Notification No. 34/97 providing duty exemption for DEPB imports. The Tribunal upheld the authority's decision to re-credit the refund in DEPB, as the appellants did not pay the duty in cash. The Tribunal cited the Essar Steel Ltd. case, stating that only those paying duty in cash are eligible for cash refunds, while those debiting DEPB cannot claim cash refunds. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, as the appellants did not meet the criteria for cash refund. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the authority's decision to re-credit the refund in DEPB, as the appellants did not pay duty in cash, aligning with the provisions of Section 27 and the exemption under Notification No. 34/97. The case serves as a precedent that only those paying duty in cash are entitled to cash refunds, while DEPB debits do not qualify for the same.
|
