Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2006 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (7) TMI 507 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Classification of items in a classification list for a Water Treatment Plant.

In this case, the appellants filed a classification list for a Water Treatment Plant under sub-heading 8421.01 for the period 1996-97, including various items. The ld. Assistant Commissioner classified some items as part of the Water Treatment Plant and others as parts attracting a higher rate of duty under sub-heading 8421.90. The appellants contested this classification, specifically regarding items for removing carbon dioxide and pumping water to elevated places. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the original classification. The issue involved the correct classification of these items within the Water Treatment Plant.

Upon examination, it was found that the items for removing carbon dioxide and pumping water were integral parts of water treatment. The appellants argued that these activities were crucial components of the overall water treatment process. The Department did not dispute these claims. The Tribunal concluded that singling out these items for separate classification was incorrect. It was established that removing carbon dioxide and pumping water to higher levels were indeed essential aspects of water treatment. Consequently, all the items in question, along with others in the classification list, were classified as part of the Water Treatment Plant.

As a result, the impugned order regarding the classification of specific items was set aside. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the items for removing carbon dioxide, pumping water, and others were integral to the Water Treatment Plant. The decision was dictated and pronounced in open court, concluding the classification dispute in favor of the appellants.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates