2008 (3) TMI 511 - AT - Income Tax

Repairs and insurance of machinery, plant and furniture, Bad debts, Foreign currency , Business disallowance

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of disallowance of bad debts written off.
2. Deletion of disallowance of repair and maintenance expenses.
3. Deletion of disallowance of interest written off.
4. Deletion of disallowance of depreciation due to foreign exchange rate fluctuation.
5. Deletion of addition of prior period expenses.
6. Deletion of addition of debenture issue expenses.
7. Disallowance of additional warranty provision.
8. Disallowance of guest house expenses.
9. Disallowance of royalty expenses.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Disallowance of Bad Debts Written Off:
The assessee wrote off Rs. 2,19,609 as bad debts, which were advances given for raw materials from Steri Group. The Assessing Officer disallowed this, considering it a capital expenditure. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, accepting that the amount was for raw materials, not assets. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the amount written off was a revenue loss, not a capital loss.

2. Deletion of Disallowance of Repair and Maintenance Expenses:
The assessee claimed Rs. 2,66,920 for service kits for old machinery as revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer treated it as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, stating it was for maintaining existing assets. The Tribunal agreed, citing that the expenditure fell under 'current repairs' as per Section 31 of the Act, and was allowable.

3. Deletion of Disallowance of Interest Written Off:
The assessee wrote off Rs. 13,64,000 in interest from loans to Harita Stock Limited (HSL), which were squared off by appropriating shares. The Assessing Officer disallowed the write-off. The CIT(A) allowed it, noting it was previously included in taxable income. The Tribunal upheld this, referencing Delhi High Court rulings that write-offs in accounts meet Section 36(1)(vii) requirements.

4. Deletion of Disallowance of Depreciation Due to Foreign Exchange Rate Fluctuation:
The assessee claimed depreciation of Rs. 7,54,793 on fixed assets due to foreign exchange fluctuation. The Assessing Officer disallowed it, stating it should be recognized at actual repayment. The CIT(A) allowed it, and the Tribunal affirmed, referencing the Delhi High Court decision in Woodward Governor India (P.) Ltd., which held that adjustments should be made in the year of fluctuation.

5. Deletion of Addition of Prior Period Expenses:
The assessee accounted for Rs. 4,22,569 in expenses from the previous year, which were offered for taxation. The Assessing Officer added this amount again. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting it was already included in the computation of income. The Tribunal found no infirmity in this decision, preventing double addition.

6. Deletion of Addition of Debenture Issue Expenses:
The assessee's claim for 1/7th and 1/10th of debenture issue expenses for assessment years 1990-91 and 1993-94 was disallowed by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance, as the entire expenses were already allowed in the year of issue.

7. Disallowance of Additional Warranty Provision:
The assessee provided an additional warranty liability of Rs. 3,09,42,798 based on actuarial valuation. The Assessing Officer disallowed it, considering it contingent. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance, noting the provision was scientifically based on actuarial valuation and necessary to meet outstanding warranty obligations.

8. Disallowance of Guest House Expenses:
The assessee's claim for Rs. 5,00,326 in guest house expenses was disallowed, following the Supreme Court decision in Britannia Industries Ltd., which held such expenses are disallowed under Section 37(4) of the Act. The Tribunal upheld this disallowance.

9. Disallowance of Royalty Expenses:
The assessee claimed Rs. 70,66,000 in royalty expenses, deducted in the year under appeal but paid in the subsequent year. The CIT(A) disallowed it, but the Tribunal deleted the disallowance, referencing Delhi High Court decisions in Oracle Software India Ltd. and Nestle India Ltd., which allowed deductions if tax was deducted within the relevant year and paid within the prescribed time.

Conclusion:
Both appeals were partly allowed, with several disallowances deleted based on established legal principles and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of scientific methods and compliance with statutory provisions in determining allowable deductions.

← Previous Next →