Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2006 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (6) TMI 445 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Restoration of appeal due to non-prosecution, Denial of Modvat credit on specific items

Restoration of Appeal:
The judgment deals with applications for the restoration of an appeal that was dismissed for non-prosecution by the Tribunal. The appellant claimed they did not receive the hearing intimation in time, which was supported by the envelope produced as evidence. The Tribunal found this reason justifiable and recalled the final order, restoring the appeals to their original numbers. Since the issue was covered by a previous decision of the Tribunal in the appellant's own case, the appeals were taken up for disposal.

Denial of Modvat Credit:
The appellant's appeals were against the denial of Modvat credit on specific items - Snub Pully and straight idlers with brackets. The appellant argued that these items were used in the cement factory for various machinery. Referring to a previous decision of the Tribunal, it was established that the appellant was entitled to Modvat credit on these parts. The Tribunal noted that the Departmental Representative could not confirm if any appeal was filed against the previous decision. Following the precedent, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders denying Modvat credit and allowing the appeals.

In conclusion, the judgment addressed the restoration of appeals due to non-prosecution and the denial of Modvat credit on specific items based on previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal found the reasons for non-prosecution justifiable and restored the appeals. Regarding the Modvat credit issue, the Tribunal relied on a previous decision to rule in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of credit and allowing the appeals.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates