Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2008 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2008 (1) TMI 663 - AT - Customs

Issues:
Confiscation of second-hand capital goods, Customs duty demand, penalties imposition, redemption of purchased goods without knowledge of import under E.P.C.G.

Confiscation of Second-Hand Capital Goods:
The case involved the confiscation of second-hand capital goods, specifically a complete calendaring line for PVC packaging film, imported by a company. The adjudicating authority confirmed the Customs duty demand against the importer and imposed penalties on the importer and others. The Tribunal considered the appeal of a purchaser of a part of the imported goods and focused on the option for redemption of the purchased goods.

Redemption of Purchased Goods without Knowledge of Import under E.P.C.G:
The appellant sought the option to redeem the goods they purchased without knowing that the goods were imported under the E.P.C.G scheme. The Tribunal noted that the appellants had no reason to suspect that the goods were imported under E.P.C.G and acted in good faith. The Commissioner acknowledged that there was no evidence indicating that the appellants were aware of the liability of the imported goods to confiscation. Consequently, the Tribunal accepted the prayer for extending the option for redemption on payment of a fine in lieu of confiscation.

Decision and Remand:
The Tribunal directed that the case be remanded to the adjudicating authority to determine the quantum of redemption fine to be paid by the appellants. The authority was instructed to provide a reasonable opportunity for the appellants to be heard on the matter. The appeal was disposed of with the decision to allow redemption of the goods purchased by the appellants, subject to the determination of the redemption fine by the adjudicating authority.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates