Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (5) TMI 563 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
1. Duty amount and penalty pre-deposit requirement for non-return of moulds sent to job worker. 2. Interpretation of the provision exempting return of moulds within 180 days under Cenvat Credit Rules. 3. Commissioner's decision and appellant's case on merits. Analysis: 1. The judgment dealt with the issue of the appellant being required to pre-deposit a duty amount and equal penalty due to the non-return of moulds sent to a job worker for the production of goods. The appellant argued that the moulds were not returned within 180 days as required, leading to the demands being confirmed. 2. The appellant's consultant referred to the Supplementary Central Excise Law Manual 2008-09, highlighting a provision exempting the return of jigs, fixtures, moulds, and dies sent to job workers within 180 days as per clause (a) of sub-rule (5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The consultant contended that the non-return of moulds should not be a basis for confirming the demands and requested a full waiver of the pre-deposit. 3. The respondent, represented by the SDR, acknowledged the non-return of moulds dating back to 2001-03 and emphasized that the moulds had still not been returned. However, upon being informed about the clarification in the supplementary manual, the SDR left the decision to the Bench's discretion. The SDR also noted that the Commissioner had differentiated the appellant's arguments and highlighted the lack of a strong case on merits, suggesting that the appellants be put on terms. 4. After carefully reviewing the supplementary manual issued by the Board, the Tribunal observed a provision exempting the return of moulds within 180 days as per clause (a) of sub-rule (5). Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the stay application, granting a waiver of the pre-deposit and staying its recovery until the appeal's disposal. The stay order was to remain in force even after the expiration of 180 days, with the matter scheduled to proceed in due course.
|