Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (4) TMI 583 - AT - Central Excise

/appeal-tribunal-cestat-new-delhi-citation-2009-4-tmi-583-cestat-new-delhi

Judgement Summary: Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI Citation: 2009 (4) TMI 583 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI

Judges: S/Shri D.N. Panda, Rakesh Kumar, JJ.

Representatives:
- Shri Prem Ranjan, Advocate, for the Appellant.
- Shri A.K. Rastogi, DR, for the Respondent.

Order per: D.N. Panda, Member (J)

Summary:
1. The case revolves around the misuse of Cenvat credit by the Appellant, with the Revenue claiming that the credit was mis-utilized without proper evidence. The Appellant argues that export was made, hence the Cenvat credit is valid.

2. The Revenue presents a detailed investigation report revealing fake and bogus credits availed by the Appellant. The investigation results in a demand for recovery of duty, interest, and penalty from the Appellant due to unjust enrichment.

3. After hearing both sides, the Adjudicating Authority found the Appellant guilty of defrauding Revenue by availing Cenvat credit with ulterior motives. The Appellant failed to reply to show cause notices and provide any credible evidence to counter the charges.

4. The Tribunal orders the Appellant to deposit the entire demanded amount as a pre-deposit during the appeal process. The recovery includes Cenvat credit, penalty, and interest. Another individual involved is directed to deposit a specific penalty amount.

5. The Tribunal's decision is based on the lack of a convincing defense from the Appellant and the failure to follow due process. The judgement emphasizes the need for compliance with the order and reporting by a specified date.

This summary provides an overview of the key issues and outcomes of the judgement, highlighting the misuse of Cenvat credit and the subsequent penalties imposed on the Appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates