9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (1) TMI 714 - AT - Central Excise
Issues: Condonation of delay in filing appeal, requirement of clearance from Committee of Disputes for appeal from a Central Government Undertaking
Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal: The case involves an application for condonation of 437 days of delay in filing an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal dated 21-2-07 passed by the CCE (Appeals), Bhopal. The appellant received the Commissioner (Appeals) order on 3-3-07 but filed the appeal only on 14th August, 2008, seeking condonation of the delay. The appellant cited delay in seeking permission from its Head Office as the reason for the delay. However, the Tribunal found this reason invalid and not a justifiable ground for such a significant delay. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions, dismissed the application for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal itself. Requirement of Clearance from Committee of Disputes for Appeal from a Central Government Undertaking: The appeal in question pertained to BSNL, a Central Government Undertaking. The ld. DR argued that the appeal required clearance from the Committee of Disputes, which had not been obtained. The absence of this clearance was presented as a reason for the appeal being not only time-barred but also not maintainable. The Tribunal concurred with this argument and noted that the clearance from the Committee of Disputes was indeed a prerequisite for the admission of the appeal. Since this clearance was not produced, the Tribunal dismissed both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal itself, emphasizing the necessity of complying with the procedural requirements for appeals from Central Government Undertakings. In conclusion, the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dealt with the issues of condonation of delay in filing an appeal and the requirement of clearance from the Committee of Disputes for appeals from Central Government Undertakings. The Tribunal found the reasons for the delay in filing the appeal inadequate and emphasized the importance of obtaining the necessary clearance for such appeals. As a result, the application for condonation of delay and the appeal were both dismissed.
|
