Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (4) TMI 724 - AT - Central Excise

The appellate tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, under the direction of Shri Rakesh Kumar, J., heard an appeal by the Revenue against an order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Kanpur. The appeal sought to enhance the penalty imposed on the respondent from Rs. 2500 to Rs. 10,000. The penalty was imposed on the authorized signatory of M/s. Kanpur Edibles (P) Ltd. under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the review appeal filed by the Department, leading to the current appeal.

During the hearing, the Departmental Representative (DR) argued that the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules should be enhanced to Rs. 10,000 as it is the minimum prescribed amount. However, the tribunal, after reviewing the case and considering the 2008 case of CCE, Bhopal v. Rama Wood Craft (P) Ltd., concluded that the rules do not specify a minimum penalty, only an upper limit. Therefore, the tribunal found no fault in the Commissioner's decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The order was dictated in open court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates