Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1999 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (4) TMI 9 - HC - Income Tax

Issues: Disallowance of credits claimed by the assessee and addition of Rs. 73,500 to the income returned by the assessee.

Judgment Summary:

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana addressed a case concerning the disallowance of credits claimed by the assessee and the subsequent addition of Rs. 73,500 to the income returned. The Tribunal, after reviewing the evidence, found the assessing and appellate authorities' decision to be unwarranted and allowed the appeal. The Revenue challenged this decision by filing a petition under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking the High Court's opinion on the matter.

The Tribunal, upon consideration, determined that its decision was based on the appreciation of evidence and did not give rise to any question of law. The petitioner argued that the burden of proving the capacity to advance loans rested on the assessee, and the Tribunal's decision should have addressed the reasons provided by the authorities. Citing relevant case law, the petitioner contended that the Tribunal's decision raised a question of law. However, the High Court noted that the assessee had initially produced affidavits from individuals who had advanced loans, and these individuals had also appeared before the authority, where their statements were recorded and they were questioned. Based on this evidence, the Tribunal made its decision to allow the credits claimed by the assessee, emphasizing that it was a result of a pure appreciation of evidence.

Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the petition, affirming that the Tribunal's decision was grounded in a thorough examination of the evidence, and no question of law arose from the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates