9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The nature of receipts of subsidy granted by the Central Government to the assessee, allowability of depreciation on an asset not registered in the name of the assessee-company, and the deletion of subsidy received by the assessee as capital account. Nature of Subsidy Receipts: The Tribunal held that the subsidy receipts are of a casual and non-recurring nature as per section 10(3) of the Income-tax Act and not covered by the proviso to section 10(3) of the Act, hence not taxable in the hands of the assessee. The Tribunal's decision was based on the fact that the subsidy filled the hole created in the profits of the assessee by spending on managerial expenses and rent, resulting in no effect on the income and tax liability of the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the subsidy receipts were non-taxable, but the claim of expenses was not allowable. Allowability of Depreciation: In the case of depreciation on an asset not registered in the name of the assessee-company, the Tribunal's decision was in line with the court's precedent in Gowersons Publishers (Pvt.) Ltd. v. CIT [1999] 240 ITR 191 [FB]. The Tribunal's view was upheld, and the reference was answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. Deletion of Subsidy as Capital Account: Regarding the deletion of Rs.75,000 received as subsidy from the Central Government on capital account, the Tribunal found that the receipt was made in a previous year and was utilized for acquiring a capital asset as earmarked. The Tribunal's decision was supported by these facts, and the question related to this issue was answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. Conclusion: All the references were disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal's decisions upheld in favor of the assessee on the nature of subsidy receipts and the allowability of depreciation, as well as the deletion of subsidy received as capital account.
|
