9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Rectification of assessment under section 143(1)(a) 2. Jurisdiction under section 154 to rectify order based on debatable issues 3. Adjustment to book profits under section 115J during rectification under section 143(1)(a) Analysis: The judgment pertains to an appeal by the Revenue concerning the assessment year 1989-90, specifically focusing on the rectification of assessment under section 143(1)(a). The assessing authority had rectified the assessment under section 154, addressing various aspects such as sale consideration of land and building, provisions for bad debts, depreciation, investments, and sales tax. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the assessee's appeal, deeming the issues debatable and not suitable for adjustment under section 143(1)(a) or section 154. The appellate authority questioned the jurisdiction of the officer under section 115J to modify book profits directly credited to the general reserve account, approved by shareholders. Consequently, the appellate authority directed a reduction in income by Rs. 2.60 crores under section 154, leading to the appeal being allowed. Upon further appeal to the Tribunal, it was established that the issues were indeed debatable, affirming the Commissioner's stance. The Revenue raised questions challenging the Tribunal's decision, questioning whether decisions on debatable points of law can be considered mistakes apparent from the record under section 154, and whether adjustments to book profits under section 115J are permissible during rectification under section 143(1)(a). In delivering the judgment, the Court referred to precedents and highlighted the scope of section 143(1)(a) in conjunction with the jurisdiction available under section 154, citing relevant cases. Relying on previous decisions, the Court found no grounds to support the Revenue's plea, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on the basis that no substantial question of law warranted the case's admission.
|
