2000 (10) TMI 8 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Tax rate applicable to the transaction between the petitioner and Alcan International Ltd.
2. Classification of the payment as "royalty" or "fees for technical services."

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Tax Rate Applicable to the Transaction:
The petitioner sought a clearance certificate from the income-tax authority for a payment to Alcan International Ltd., Canada, under an agreement for the transfer of technology and related engineering services. The Income-tax Officer levied a 40% tax on the total consideration of 183,000 Canadian dollars, which the petitioner contested. The petitioner argued that the applicable tax rate should be 20% under section 115A(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act because the transaction involved the transfer of designs and drawings outside India. The court noted that the Commissioner of Income-tax did not address this specific plea in the revisional order, and the Department failed to file a reply, leading the court to proceed on the merits of the case.

2. Classification of Payment as "Royalty" or "Fees for Technical Services":
The agreement between the petitioner and Alcan International Ltd. included clauses for the transfer of technology, drawings, and designs, and technical engineering consulting charges. The petitioner contended that the entire amount should be classified as "royalty," attracting a 20% tax rate under Explanation 2 to section 9 of the Income-tax Act. The Department argued that only the payment for drawings and designs should be taxed at 20%, while the rest should be considered "fees for technical services" and taxed at 40%. The court examined the agreement and found that the services provided by Alcan International Ltd. in India were minimal and did not constitute "technical services" as defined in Explanation 2 to section 9. The court concluded that the entire payment was for the transfer of technology and should be taxed at 20%.

Judgment:
The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order dated February 24, 1994, and directed the respondent to pass an order holding that the petitioner should deduct tax at source at the rate of 20% from the lump sum consideration paid to Alcan International Ltd. and issue a "No Objection Certificate" for the remittance of the instalments. The court did not address the issue of refund as it was not raised before them.

Prayer Clauses:
(a) The court quashed and set aside the order dated February 24, 1994.
(b) The court directed the respondent to hold that the petitioner should deduct tax at 20% and issue a "No Objection Certificate" for the remittance of the instalments to Alcan International Ltd.