9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding applicability to the case. Analysis: The judgment of the High Court of Delhi pertained to a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the applicability of section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to a specific case concerning the assessment year 1975-76. The primary question was whether the provisions of section 144B were applicable to the case in question. The dispute arose from the Income-tax Officer's determination of the loss and unabsorbed depreciation, leading to a variation between the returned figures and the determined figures. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner insisted on applying section 144B due to the perceived variation exceeding Rs. 1 lakh. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) disagreed, stating that as the variation related only to the current year's loss and not the unabsorbed loss brought forward, section 144B was not applicable. The Commissioner also highlighted the limitation period under section 153(1) of the Act, which affected the assessment's validity. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, prompting the Revenue to appeal. The High Court analyzed the provisions of section 144B to determine the scope of "any variation in the income or loss returned." The Court emphasized that the loss returned specifically pertained to the assessment year in question, 1975-76, and did not include carry forward or unabsorbed losses from previous years. Therefore, the aggregate loss of Rs. 2,02,915, comprising the brought forward loss and the current year's loss, was not considered the loss returned for the relevant assessment year. Instead, only the current year's loss of Rs. 69,898 was deemed the loss returned by the assessee. Consequently, the variation in this specific loss alone was relevant for assessing the applicability of section 144B. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's interpretation, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment clarified the interpretation of section 144B in the context of the specific case, emphasizing the distinction between the loss returned for the assessment year and carry forward losses. The Court's analysis focused on the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act to determine the applicability of section 144B, ultimately resolving the dispute in favor of the assessee.
|
