Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2000 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (2) TMI 41 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
- Rejection of rectification application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The High Court of BOMBAY considered the issue of whether the Tribunal was correct in rejecting the rectification application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the basis that it was misconceived and not maintainable. The case revolved around a double taxation avoidance agreement between the Government of India and the Federal Republic of Germany, which exempted royalties and fees for technical services from Indian income tax. However, an amendment to the agreement made these payments taxable. The assessee had entered into agreements with German companies before the amendment came into effect and made payments based on those agreements. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, but the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee. Subsequently, the Department filed a rectification application, arguing that the Tribunal's decision was incorrect. The Tribunal rejected the application, stating that there was no mistake apparent from the record. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the Tribunal's ruling regarding the non-applicability of the amendment to contracts executed before a specific date was not challenged by the Department, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

In conclusion, the High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision to reject the rectification application, highlighting that the Tribunal's previous ruling on the non-applicability of the amendment to contracts executed before a certain date remained unchallenged. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's judgment and dismissed the appeal accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates