Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1967 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1967 (2) TMI 90 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues:
1. Interpretation of penalty provision under section 17(3) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 in relation to late submission of returns in Form V under the Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax (Central) Rules, 1957.

Detailed Analysis:
The judgment delivered by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh involved a reference made by the Sales Tax Tribunal under section 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh. The primary issue was whether the penalty for late submission of returns in Form V, as per the Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax (Central) Rules, 1957, could be imposed under section 17(3) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The case pertained to an assessee who was penalized for failing to file returns within the prescribed period, leading to an appeal where the penalty imposition was challenged based on the existence of rules framed by the State Government under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Board of Revenue set aside the penalty citing the presence of rules under the Central Act, specifically the Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax (Central) Rules, 1957, which contained provisions for penalties, thereby questioning the applicability of section 17(3) of the State Act.

The judgment extensively analyzed the relevant provisions, including Section 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Section 17(3) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, and the Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax (Central) Rules, 1957. It was highlighted that the imposition of penalties for non-compliance was governed by the State Act and its rules, as per the provisions of Section 9(3) of the Central Act, which mandated the application of State laws for assessment and collection of taxes. The Court emphasized that any breach related to the filing of returns was under the purview of the State Act and Rules, not the Central Rules, even if the latter prescribed the form of returns. The judgment clarified that the penalty for late submission of returns fell within the ambit of section 17(3) of the State Act, and the Board of Revenue erred in considering the penalty imposition under the Central Rules instead of the State Act.

Moreover, the Court discussed the application of Rule 10-B, which reiterated the applicability of the State Act and its rules to proceedings concerning the Act. It was emphasized that any interpretation allowing penalties under the Central Rules would contradict Section 9(3) of the Central Act, which mandated adherence to State laws for tax assessment and enforcement. The judgment further invoked the principle of "generalia specialibus non derogant," asserting that the specific provisions of section 17(3) of the State Act regarding penalties for late returns must prevail over any inconsistent provisions in the Central Rules.

In conclusion, the Court answered the reference by affirming that the penalty for late submission of returns in Form V under the Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax (Central) Rules, 1957, could be imposed under section 17(3) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh, was awarded costs for the reference, with a fixed counsel fee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates