9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Valuation of unquoted shares under rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. 2. Deductibility of debt amounting to Rs. 1,33,327 from net wealth under section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. Valuation of Unquoted Shares: The case involved a dispute regarding the valuation of unquoted shares for the assessment year 1977-78. Initially, the assessee declared the value of these shares at face value but later revised the valuation based on a yield basis. The Assessing Officer rejected the revised valuation and determined the value in accordance with rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's valuation, stating that rule 1D was mandatory for valuing unquoted shares. The apex court's decision in Bharat Hari Singhania v. CWT was cited, emphasizing the mandatory nature of rule 1D. The court concluded that the Assessing Officer was bound to follow rule 1D, making the question of its mandatory nature irrelevant. Deductibility of Debt from Net Wealth: The second issue revolved around the deductibility of a debt amounting to Rs. 1,33,327 from the assessee's net wealth. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction under section 2(m)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that the debt was incurred in relation to shares not chargeable to wealth tax under section 5 of the Act. Section 2(m)(ii) prohibits deductions for debts related to property not subject to wealth tax. The court concurred with the Tribunal's finding, affirming that the debt was rightly not deductible from the net wealth. The judgment favored the Revenue on this issue. In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision on both issues. It reiterated the mandatory nature of rule 1D for valuing unquoted shares and affirmed the non-deductibility of the debt amount from the assessee's net wealth under section 2(m)(ii). The judgment was delivered by Arijit Pasayat, C.J., and D. K. Jain.
|
