Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + HC Wealth-tax - 2000 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (7) TMI 39 - HC - Wealth-tax

Issues involved:
The jurisdiction of the Wealth-tax Officer to consider the valuation of immovable properties in reassessment proceedings u/s 17(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68.

Summary:

The High Court of Delhi, in a judgment delivered by Arijit Pasayat C. J., addressed the issue of the Wealth-tax Officer's jurisdiction to consider the valuation of immovable properties in reassessment proceedings u/s 17(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68. The case involved the late Hans Raj Vadera's wealth returns for the mentioned years, which were initially accepted but later reopened under section 17 of the Act after his demise. The reassessment led to an increase in net wealth, particularly concerning the valuation of two properties. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the validity of the reassessment related to shares but deemed the enhancement of property valuation beyond the scope of reassessment u/s 17(1)(a). The Tribunal referred the matter to the High Court, where the Revenue argued that reassessment proceedings allow for a comprehensive review, while the assessee contended that reassessment is limited to the initially noticed items.

The Court emphasized that once assessment proceedings are reopened, the entire assessment is revisited, and the Assessing Officer is empowered to tax any previously unassessed income or wealth. Citing legal precedents, the Court clarified that reassessment aims to bring escaped items into taxation, resetting the assessment process without affecting the original assessment's validity. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming that reassessment proceedings are not confined to the initially noticed items but encompass all aspects of income or wealth that were previously unassessed.

In conclusion, the Court's judgment favored the Revenue's stance, highlighting the broad scope of reassessment proceedings once initiated, allowing for the taxation of all previously unassessed income or wealth without limitations to the initially noticed items.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates