9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
(i) Ex parte order to charge TDS and interest without notice. (ii) Time-barred order to charge TDS. (iii) Liability to pay interest for late payment on TDS. Analysis: (i) Ex parte order to charge TDS and interest without notice: The Assessing Officer issued a show-cause notice on August 26, 2004, detailing the lacunae and shortcomings, allowing the assessee to respond by September 10, 2004. The counsel for the assessee acknowledged the receipt of the notice, dismissing the contention of lack of notice. Therefore, this issue was dismissed. (ii) Time-barred order to charge TDS: Referring to a judgment by the Delhi High Court, it was established that the assessments for the financial years 1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-01 were time-barred as four years had elapsed from the initiation of proceedings. Following the court's decision, the Tribunal quashed the assessments for those years. (iii) Liability to pay interest for late payment on TDS: The counsel for the assessee argued that as per a CBDT circular, no interest was payable on late TDS deposit if the tax was deductible by the Government. However, the Tribunal found that the payments in question did not fall under the mentioned categories, hence the circular did not apply. The counsel also contended that as the contracts were for the supply of goods, TDS deduction was not required. The Tribunal, considering the provisions of section 201 and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, held that the assessee was liable to pay interest if tax was deducted but not deposited. Therefore, this issue was decided in favor of the Revenue. In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by the assessee, dismissing the issue of lack of notice for TDS and interest, quashing the time-barred assessments, and ruling in favor of the Revenue regarding the liability to pay interest for late TDS payment.
|
