Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2000 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (4) TMI 35 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Deduction of maintenance and administrative charges against house property income of a cooperative housing society.

Analysis:
The case involved a cooperative housing society claiming a deduction on maintenance and administrative charges against its house property income. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that all expenses were incurred for maintaining the society's building, which should be reimbursed by the members as per the bye-laws. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directed the Income-tax Officer to deduct the loss in administrative heads from house property income and other sources. However, the Tribunal disagreed, emphasizing that members were expected to reimburse all expenses incurred by the society, and any shortfall should be recovered from defaulting members. The Tribunal found no provision in the bye-laws to allow deduction of such shortfalls from the house property income of the society.

The Tribunal highlighted that administrative charges collected from members did not constitute income for the society. It noted that there was no indication in the bye-laws to deduct any shortfall in reimbursement from house property income. The Tribunal emphasized the need to recover such shortfalls from defaulting members, as the charges received for reimbursement were not considered a source of income or profit for tax purposes. The Tribunal also distinguished a previous decision where the aspect raised by the Revenue in the present case was not addressed.

The Court acknowledged that every member was obligated to reimburse expenses incurred by the society, with no exemption granted. It was noted that no steps had been taken to recover the outstanding amounts from members, and there was no evidence suggesting recovery was impossible. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The judgment concluded by disposing of the application and directing all parties to act on a signed copy of the order.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates