9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Inclusion of bagging charges in the assessable value for imported Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP). Analysis: The Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the inclusion of bagging charges in the assessable value, leading to the Revenue appealing against this decision. The Revenue argued that packing was done before unloading, making it includible in the assessable value. They cited previous judgments, including one by the Hon'ble Supreme Court regarding duty collection for liquid cargo. The advocate for the respondent referenced a Tribunal decision in their favor on a similar issue. The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court's decision on warehoused goods was not directly applicable, and the Mumbai High Court's decision on counter-veiling duty was not comparable to the present case. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) relied on relevant decisions and logically concluded the issue. They emphasized the Supreme Court's stance that the value of imported goods must be determined when they touch Indian landmass post-unloading. Since the bagging did not occur before unloading in this case, the appeal by the Revenue was deemed meritless and rejected.
|
