Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (11) TMI 735 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Appeal against common order involving classification of products under Chapter 73.08 based on processes undertaken and materials supplied by Rajasthan State Electricity Board.

Analysis:
The appeals by the Department pertain to a common order involving 10 different parties and relate to the classification of products under Chapter 73.08. The Rajasthan State Electricity Board entered into agreements with the respondents for fabrication of products, supplying materials like M.S. angle, channels, plates, etc. The respondents undertook processes such as cleaning, cutting, making holes, welding, etc., on the supplied materials. Show cause notices alleged that the emerging products should be classified under Chapter 73.08. The original authority confirmed demands and imposed penalties on the parties based on the processes undertaken and the classification under Chapter 73.08.

The original authority's order lacked specificity regarding the materials supplied, processes undertaken, and final product names. The orders merely referred to the products as parts of transmission towers without detailing specific names or characteristics. The agreement between the Rajasthan Electricity Board and the respondents required products to conform to Indian Standard specifications, suggesting specific product names. The authorities did not analyze each product's raw materials, processes, and final names, leading to a generalized classification. The Commissioner (Appeals) also upheld this approach, prompting the need for a fresh consideration.

The learned SDR requested an opportunity to reconsider the issues, considering their complexity and wider implications. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) and original authority's orders, remanding the matter for a fresh assessment. The original authority is directed to reevaluate the products based on specific parameters, granting both parties a fair hearing. Respondents are given 45 days to submit detailed arguments in support of their claims. The Tribunal clarified that no opinions on the case's merits were expressed, keeping all issues open.

In conclusion, the appeals are allowed by way of remand for a comprehensive reassessment of the classification issues under Chapter 73.08, emphasizing the need for specific analysis of materials, processes, and final product names to determine the correct classification.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates