1991 (4) TMI 417 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Summary

Issues:
Interpretation of the term "vegetable seeds" for exemption under a government notification in a sales tax case.

Analysis:
The High Court of Madras heard a case where the Revenue challenged the Tribunal's decision granting exemption to sales turnover of chicory seeds under a government notification exempting certain items from sales tax. The Tribunal had ruled that chicory seeds fell under the category of "vegetable seeds" as per the exemption notification. The Revenue contended that chicory seeds did not qualify as "vegetable seeds" and thus were not entitled to exemption. The Court considered precedents such as State of West Bengal v. Washi Ahmed, M.R. Arumuga Nadar v. State of Tamil Nadu, and Thillai Chidambara Nadar v. Additional Appellate Assistant Commissioner to interpret the term "vegetable seeds." These cases emphasized interpreting such terms in their popular sense meaning, as understood by those dealing with the products. The Court concluded that chicory seeds could not be equated to "vegetable seeds" based on common parlance understanding. The judgment highlighted that the exemption notification should be strictly construed and not loosely interpreted.

The Court rejected the Tribunal's reasoning that chicory seeds were treated as vegetable seeds in foreign countries, emphasizing that the interpretation should be based on how the commodity is dealt with in everyday activities in the country. The Court held that the Tribunal had misconstrued the scope of "vegetable" and "vegetable seeds" by relying on assumptions and international practices. The judgment stressed the importance of interpreting terms based on their common usage by the public in the country. Consequently, the Court set aside the Tribunal's decision, ruling that the sales turnover of chicory seeds was not eligible for exemption as "vegetable seeds" under the government notification.

In conclusion, the Court allowed the tax revision case, setting aside the Tribunal's decision. The judgment highlighted the importance of interpreting legal terms based on their common understanding and usage, especially in the context of exemption notifications for tax purposes.