Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + SC Customs - 2011 (7) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (7) TMI 1026 - SC - Customs


Issues:
Violation of provisions of Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Compliance with Section 50 of the Act; Admissibility of confession made to a Custom Officer under Section 108 of the Customs Act.

Violation of Provisions of Section 22 of the NDPS Act:
The appellant was apprehended with brown powder identified as heroin during a joint Naka operation. He confessed to possession, and the Chemical Examiner confirmed the substance. The Trial Court convicted him based on evidence, including his confession to a non-police officer. The High Court upheld the conviction, leading to the appeal.

Compliance with Section 50 of the Act:
The appellant's counsel argued that the consent memo did not comply with Section 50 as it did not inform the appellant of his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. Referring to previous judgments, the Supreme Court emphasized that strict compliance with Section 50 is mandatory. The Court found that the consent memo did not convey the required information, leading to non-compliance and vitiating the prosecution.

Admissibility of Confession Made to a Custom Officer:
The appellant's counsel relied on a previous judgment stating that confessions made to Custom Officers were inadmissible under Section 25 of the Evidence Act. However, the respondent's counsel argued that a coordinate Bench judgment reiterated the admissibility of such confessions. The Court analyzed the conflicting judgments and decided to follow the precedent that a confession to a Custom Officer is inadmissible under Section 25 of the Evidence Act.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court found non-compliance with Section 50 of the Act regarding informing the appellant of his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. Additionally, the Court upheld the inadmissibility of the confession made to a Custom Officer. Consequently, the appellant's conviction was set aside, and the Court ordered his acquittal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates