Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1995 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1995 (8) TMI 287 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues:
- Inclusion of freight and forwarding charges in the term "sale price" for tax purposes under the Central Sales Tax Act.

Analysis:
The Tax Case (Revision) involved a straightforward question of whether the freight and forwarding charges incurred by the assessee should be considered as part of the "sale price" under the Central Sales Tax Act. The definition of "sale price" under section 2(h) of the Act was crucial in determining the taxability of these charges. The definition includes the amount payable to a dealer as consideration for the sale of goods, but excludes the cost of freight or delivery unless separately charged. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to establish that the freight and forwarding charges were part of the sale price.

The Tribunal noted that the appellant consistently showed the freight and forwarding charges separately in the bills, indicating that these charges were not integrated into the sale price. Even though there was a discrepancy in the Tribunal's observations regarding whether the charges formed part of the price, the legal principles outlined in the judgment clarified that if the charges fall under the exclusion clause of the definition of "sale price," they should be excluded from taxation. The judgment referenced a previous case to support this interpretation, emphasizing that the decision of the Tribunal should not be disturbed.

Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the Tax Case (Revision) filed by the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal's decision that the freight and forwarding charges were not includible in the "sale price" for tax purposes. The judgment concluded by stating that no costs were awarded in this matter, thereby settling the issue in favor of the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates