9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Working out of capital gains arising from the sale of depreciable asset. 2. Disallowance of interest payments on the ground that the borrowed funds were advanced free of interest to sister concerns. Summary: Issue 1: Working out of capital gains arising from the sale of depreciable asset The assessee, a public limited company, contested the working out of capital gains from the sale of an office building, a depreciable asset, arguing that the cost of a newly acquired office building should be included in the block of assets despite it not being used in the previous year. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this adjustment, stating that the new building was not used for business purposes, thus not falling within the same block of assets u/s 2(11) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the AO's decision, emphasizing the requirement of asset usage for business purposes u/s 43(6) for depreciation claims. The Tribunal, however, found that section 50, which deals with the computation of capital gains on depreciable assets, does not stipulate the condition of the asset being used for business purposes. The Tribunal concluded that the adjustment of the cost of the newly acquired asset against the sale consideration is permissible without the pre-condition of usage for business purposes. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim, allowing the adjustment of Rs. 72,16,526 and deleting the addition of Rs. 62,99,833. Issue 2: Disallowance of interest payments The second issue involved the disallowance of interest of Rs. 15,300 on the grounds that the assessee had advanced Rs. 1,02,000 free of interest to certain parties. The assessee argued that it had sufficient capital and free reserves amounting to Rs. 71.49 lakhs, and there was no nexus between the borrowed funds and the amounts advanced. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, stating that the lower authorities failed to establish a nexus between the borrowed funds and the advances. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's claim and upheld it, rejecting the disallowance of interest. Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues.
|
