9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves the interpretation of section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the disallowance of reimbursement charges paid to the holding company by the assessee for the assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81.
Summary: Background: The assessee, a subsidiary company, reimbursed its holding company for expenses incurred in utilizing the services of the holding company's employees for letting out warehouses and godowns. Commissioner's Action: The Commissioner of Income-tax found the reimbursements excessive compared to previous years, lacking a separate agreement, and not entirely based on business needs. He set aside the assessment for reconsideration under section 263 of the Income-tax Act. Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, referring the question of disallowing the deduction of reimbursement charges to the High Court. Reframing the Question: The High Court found the original question misleading and reframed it to focus on whether the Commissioner correctly invoked his jurisdiction under section 263. Legal Arguments: The assessee's counsel argued that section 263 is for correcting distortions to revenue, not for review purposes. The Revenue's counsel contended that the Commissioner rightly used his power to rectify distortions caused by the Income-tax Officer's oversight. Analysis: The Court noted the absence of an agreement between the companies, lack of consideration of section 40A(2)(b) by the Income-tax Officer, and excessive reimbursements. The Commissioner's action was deemed appropriate to rectify revenue distortions. Conclusion: The Court upheld the Commissioner's decision under section 263, finding it within his jurisdictional limits to correct revenue distortions. The judgment was in favor of the Revenue, and the tax cases were disposed of without costs.
|
