Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1997 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1997 (7) TMI 27 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Whether the Tribunal was right in directing the Income-tax Officer to carry out the rectification under section 154?
2. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee-firm was entitled to carry forward the loss of the unregistered firm to be set off against the income of the registered firm in the year in which the firm earns income?

Analysis:

Issue 1: Rectification under Section 154
The assessee, a firm, filed an application under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, pointing out that a loss from a previous year had not been carried forward for set off. The Income-tax Officer rejected the application, stating that as the firm had been granted registration for a subsequent year, the loss of the unregistered firm could not be carried forward. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this decision. However, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's appeal, directing the Income-tax Officer to carry out the rectification. The High Court, relying on precedent, concluded that the rectification was justified, as per the provisions of the Act.

Issue 2: Carry Forward of Loss
The main contention was whether the assessee-firm could carry forward the loss of an unregistered firm to set off against the income of a registered firm in a subsequent year. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the carry forward of the loss. The High Court referred to a Division Bench judgment in a similar case, where it was held that if an unregistered firm becomes registered in subsequent years without a change in constitution, the loss can still be carried forward. The High Court, based on this precedent, concluded that the assessee was entitled to carry forward the loss, deciding in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.

In conclusion, the High Court answered both questions in the affirmative, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant provisions and previous judgments, affirming the right of the assessee to carry forward the loss and directing the Income-tax Officer to carry out the necessary rectification.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates