Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1998 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1998 (11) TMI 116 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Inclusion of excise duty in the closing stock of finished goods.
2. Treatment of payment to executive director as 'profits in lieu of salary' under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Inclusion of excise duty in the closing stock of finished goods
The first question raised was whether excise duty paid on goods lying at the company's depot at the end of the year should be included in the value of the closing stock of finished goods. The counsel for the assessee did not press this question as it had become academic. Therefore, Question No. 1 was returned unanswered.

Issue 2: Treatment of payment to executive director as 'profits in lieu of salary'
The second question revolved around whether a payment of Rs. 1,00,000 made to the executive director of the company should be considered as 'profits in lieu of salary' under section 40A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The company argued that the payment was for exceptional services rendered by the director and not in the nature of salary. However, the Income-tax Officer, Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal all held that the payment constituted 'profits in lieu of salary.' The Tribunal specifically noted that the amount was a special bonus for exceptional services. The court, after considering the submissions and the relevant provisions of the Act, agreed with the Tribunal's finding. The payment fell within the definition of 'profits in lieu of salary' as per clause (3) of section 17 of the Act. Therefore, Question No. 2 was answered in the affirmative, in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.

In conclusion, the reference was disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates