9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Jurisdiction of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal to hear the appeal under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Jurisdiction of the Tribunal The case involved a revision application under Section 131 of the Customs Act, 1962, which was transferred to the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal as an appeal due to the provisions of Section 131B. The appellant argued that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal based on the Finance Act, 1984, specifically Section 40. The appellant emphasized the impact of the Finance Act on the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and requested the transfer of the appeal to the Central Government. The respondent, however, contended that the Tribunal still had jurisdiction to decide the appeal. Issue 1 Analysis: The Tribunal examined the relevant sections of the Customs Act, 1962, before and after the amendment by the Finance Act, 1984. It noted that the cases to be transferred to the Central Government were limited to specific categories mentioned in Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 129A. Since the present appeal fell under Clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 129A, the Tribunal concluded that it retained jurisdiction over the appeal. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument regarding the legislature's intention in inserting sub-section (1A) to Section 129A, emphasizing that only cases falling under Clause (b) were to be transferred to the Central Government. Therefore, the Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to decide the appeal and scheduled a hearing for further proceedings. This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key arguments presented by the parties regarding the jurisdiction of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal's decision based on the relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Finance Act, 1984.
|
