9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Assessment of pre-operative expenses as capital expenditure for depreciation calculation.
Analysis: The cases were referred to the High Court under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue for the assessment years 1978-79, 1979-80, and 1980-81. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal disposed of three appeals with a common question of law regarding the capitalization of expenditure on interest payment to partners and dealings in raw materials as pre-operative expenses for depreciation calculation. The Tribunal directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, to refer the question to the High Court. The key question referred was whether the expenditure incurred on interest payment to partners and raw material dealings should be capitalized as pre-operative expenses for depreciation purposes. The assessee, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling Fawrah (udal), claimed depreciation on machinery cost for the assessment year 1978-79. The Assessing Officer found discrepancies in the claimed pre-operative expenses, including interest paid to partners and expenses related to raw material dealings before business commencement. The Income-tax Officer disallowed a portion of the claimed expenses, leading to an appeal by the assessee. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the Income-tax Officer's decision, prompting the matter to be taken to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta Bench "R". The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that expenses incurred before business setup cannot be treated as revenue expenditure and must be capitalized. The Tribunal relied on precedents to support its decision. However, the High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's reasoning. The High Court noted that the nature of expenses incurred before business commencement must be carefully analyzed. In this case, the payment of interest to partners and expenses related to raw material dealings did not have a direct nexus with setting up the business or installing machinery. The High Court opined that such expenses were not capital in nature but rather appropriation of funds among partners. Therefore, the High Court held that the claimed expenses should not be added to the actual machinery cost for depreciation calculation. In conclusion, the High Court answered the question in the negative, favoring the Revenue. Judge S. N. Jha concurred with the decision. The judgment emphasized the importance of distinguishing between capital and revenue expenditure and highlighted that not all expenses incurred before business commencement should be capitalized. The decision provided clarity on the treatment of pre-operative expenses for depreciation calculation, emphasizing the need for a direct nexus between expenses and business setup for capitalization.
|
