9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Validity of notice u/s 147 of Income-tax Act for assessment years 1985-86 and 1988-89.
For assessment year 1985-86: The petitioner, a minor, filed a return through his father. The Income-tax Officer completed the assessment and informed the petitioner about the refundable amount. Subsequently, a notice was issued to reopen the assessment. The petitioner challenged the notice, claiming it was illegal and lacked jurisdiction as there was no omission in disclosing necessary facts for assessment. For assessment year 1988-89: The father of the minor petitioner submitted returns on behalf of the minor and the Anant Saharia Trust, where the minor was the sole beneficiary. The Assessing Officer found discrepancies in the returns, specifically related to deductions claimed under section 80L. The Officer believed that income had escaped assessment due to non-disclosure of material facts. Legal arguments: The petitioner's counsel argued that the clubbing provisions did not apply as the minor was only a beneficiary under a trust. The counsel contended that since there was no omission in disclosing material facts, the jurisdiction for reopening the assessment was not valid. On the other hand, the Revenue argued that there was a proven failure to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. Judgment: The court noted that the power u/s 147 is wide but must be based on real materials and a nexus between the materials and belief of escapement. The Assessing Officer's judgment on reopening assessments should be respected, and the court should not interfere unless there is a clear lack of material. In this case, the court found that the Assessing Officer's decision to reopen assessments was valid, and thus dismissed both writ petitions. No costs were awarded.
|
