9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the assets settled by the assessee for the deferred benefit of her son's minor son under a trust deed should be included in the net wealth of the assessee under specific provisions of the Wealth Tax Act. 2. Whether the Tribunal was correct in deleting the inclusion of the value of the property settled by the assessee on her grandson. Analysis: Issue 1: The Tribunal referred the question of whether the assets settled by the assessee for her grandson's benefit should be included in her net wealth under the Wealth Tax Act. The Revenue argued for inclusion under s. 4(1)(a)(i) or s. 4(1)(a)(v) of the Act. The assessee contended that there was no provision for adding back assets transferred for a son's minor child's deferred benefit. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that assets transferred to a trust for a minor grandchild cannot be assessed under s. 4(1)(a)(i) or s. 4(1)(a)(v) of the Act. Issue 2: The AAC initially sustained the addition under s. 4(1)(a)(i) of the Act, considering the asset transferred to the spouse of the assessee. However, the Tribunal disagreed, holding that the property transferred to the trust for the minor grandson cannot be included in the assessee's net wealth. The High Court analyzed the provisions of s. 4(1)(a)(i) and s. 4(1)(a)(v) of the Act. It concluded that the assets transferred to the trust for the grandson's benefit do not fall under either provision. The Court held that the property transferred by the grandmother in favor of her grandson, through a trust with her spouse as the trustee, should not be included in her net wealth under the Wealth Tax Act. In conclusion, the High Court answered Question No. 1 against the Department and Question No. 2 in favor of the Department. The Court found that the assets settled for the grandson's deferred benefit under a trust deed should not be included in the grandmother's net wealth for the relevant assessment years.
|
