2014 (8) TMI 991 - HC - Central Excise

Maintainability of appeal - Held that - when the matters were called there was no representation for the appellant through its counsel and the appellant is also not present in Court. The above conduct of the appellant clearly shows that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeals. Therefore these appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution - Decided against assessee.

Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed appeals from 2005 due to lack of prosecution by the appellant. No representation was made in court, leading to the dismissal of the appeals and closure of related petitions.